guardianactual
MuscleChemistry Registered Member
By Guardian
Many guys are all about AAS and or phs and some feel that SARMS are ot as tried and true as steroids. Steroids are incredible and definitely push your workouts to a new level... but wjat about SARMS?
I have used both and honestly, wether you never used anything PED wise before, like a close friend of mine or you have juiced, like I have, SARMS have their place. To start, as in a first timer going over to PEDs SARMS are great they give you a great edge. As someonewho used aas or is on HRT it still gives you an added boost and as you will read, are easier on your body than AAS and ph. So, adding them to your stack can help your resultsand possibly more.
The six pre-clinical SARMS have shown promise in many areas of treatment, which may also be beneficial to the performance enhancing athlete. This will especially hold true if side effects are relatively limited as have been with the existing SARMS already on the market. The positive benefits intended as well as some that have been unintended yet of a positive nature include:
Anabolism*-*promotion and growth of lean muscle tissue and mass. This is extremely important for the individual suffering from a muscle wasting disease. It is the muscle wasting that at times can lead to the demise of the patient even before the disease itself.
*Increases in strength*-*again, excellent for those suffering from muscle wasting diseases.
*Increased bone density and strength*- highly beneficial to the*osteoporosis*patient. SARMS may prove to be one of if not the most effective osteoporosis treatments available, although official data is still inconclusive.
*Fat Loss*- medications with strong androgen binding affinity have been shown to promote lipolysis. How significant these six SARMS are in this regard is inconclusive.
*Low to No Virilization*- this is highly important to women. Many compounds (anabolic*androgenicsteroids) while the same benefits of*anabolic steroids*can apply to women as they do men, there is often the issue of virilization. Virilization refers to the promotion of masculine like traits in women, i.e. body hair growth, a deepening of the vocal chords and clitoral enlargement. SARMS have been shown to NOT promote virilization symptoms in women. Existing data supports that the pre-clinical SARMS should be no different, although again at this stage is not fully conclusive.
*Increased Libido (Females)*- preliminary data, especially in regards to AC-262,356 has shown the SARM may increase female libido significantly.
*Contraceptive (Males)*- preliminary data, especially in regards to S-23 has shown the SARM may be an effective male contraceptive.
*Endurance & Conditioning*- All of the pre-clinical SARMS should have a level of positive effect on muscular endurance as well as overall physical conditioning. The level of effectiveness in such regards is dependent on the SARM in question and data is still inconclusive to quantify the total effects.
*Nutrient Efficiency*- All of the pre-clinical SARMS should have a positive impact on nutrient efficiency to one degree or another. This refers to the ability of the body to make better use of the nutrients it consumes.
*Estrogen*and DHT*- The pre-clinical SARMS should not aromatize, referring to the promotion of thetestosterone*to estrogen conversion. However, some increases in serum estrogen levels may be possible depending on the SARM. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) related side effects (hair loss, acne) are also not possible with these SARMS. There should also be little to no negative affect on the prostate; in fact, data shows potential prostate health improvement.
It’s not difficult to see how potentially beneficial these pre-clinical SARMS may be in a therapeutic or medical setting. It’s also fairly easy to see how they may be beneficial to the athlete, even more so when you consider the possibility of little to no side effects of consequence. However, because of the stage of research, full side effect potential is not fully understood. You may find some information from direct user experience on internet message boards, but most of this will be opinion with little factual data to back it up.
If you are attempting to buy any of the pre-clinical SARMS you will find it’s not all that easy. Many research chemical companies sell SARMS but S4, LGD-4033 and MK 2866 will be what are commonly found. You will not find an abundant market of the pre-clinical versions until if and when GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), GTx and Ligand Pharmaceuticals complete further studies; the three representing the primary researchers and developers of SARMS and related medications with GTx being perhaps the most advanced. Buyers should beware if they come across pre-clinical SARM purchases online. While such purchases are possible, they are not common and will generally be fake.
Many guys are all about AAS and or phs and some feel that SARMS are ot as tried and true as steroids. Steroids are incredible and definitely push your workouts to a new level... but wjat about SARMS?
I have used both and honestly, wether you never used anything PED wise before, like a close friend of mine or you have juiced, like I have, SARMS have their place. To start, as in a first timer going over to PEDs SARMS are great they give you a great edge. As someonewho used aas or is on HRT it still gives you an added boost and as you will read, are easier on your body than AAS and ph. So, adding them to your stack can help your resultsand possibly more.
The six pre-clinical SARMS have shown promise in many areas of treatment, which may also be beneficial to the performance enhancing athlete. This will especially hold true if side effects are relatively limited as have been with the existing SARMS already on the market. The positive benefits intended as well as some that have been unintended yet of a positive nature include:
Anabolism*-*promotion and growth of lean muscle tissue and mass. This is extremely important for the individual suffering from a muscle wasting disease. It is the muscle wasting that at times can lead to the demise of the patient even before the disease itself.
*Increases in strength*-*again, excellent for those suffering from muscle wasting diseases.
*Increased bone density and strength*- highly beneficial to the*osteoporosis*patient. SARMS may prove to be one of if not the most effective osteoporosis treatments available, although official data is still inconclusive.
*Fat Loss*- medications with strong androgen binding affinity have been shown to promote lipolysis. How significant these six SARMS are in this regard is inconclusive.
*Low to No Virilization*- this is highly important to women. Many compounds (anabolic*androgenicsteroids) while the same benefits of*anabolic steroids*can apply to women as they do men, there is often the issue of virilization. Virilization refers to the promotion of masculine like traits in women, i.e. body hair growth, a deepening of the vocal chords and clitoral enlargement. SARMS have been shown to NOT promote virilization symptoms in women. Existing data supports that the pre-clinical SARMS should be no different, although again at this stage is not fully conclusive.
*Increased Libido (Females)*- preliminary data, especially in regards to AC-262,356 has shown the SARM may increase female libido significantly.
*Contraceptive (Males)*- preliminary data, especially in regards to S-23 has shown the SARM may be an effective male contraceptive.
*Endurance & Conditioning*- All of the pre-clinical SARMS should have a level of positive effect on muscular endurance as well as overall physical conditioning. The level of effectiveness in such regards is dependent on the SARM in question and data is still inconclusive to quantify the total effects.
*Nutrient Efficiency*- All of the pre-clinical SARMS should have a positive impact on nutrient efficiency to one degree or another. This refers to the ability of the body to make better use of the nutrients it consumes.
*Estrogen*and DHT*- The pre-clinical SARMS should not aromatize, referring to the promotion of thetestosterone*to estrogen conversion. However, some increases in serum estrogen levels may be possible depending on the SARM. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) related side effects (hair loss, acne) are also not possible with these SARMS. There should also be little to no negative affect on the prostate; in fact, data shows potential prostate health improvement.
It’s not difficult to see how potentially beneficial these pre-clinical SARMS may be in a therapeutic or medical setting. It’s also fairly easy to see how they may be beneficial to the athlete, even more so when you consider the possibility of little to no side effects of consequence. However, because of the stage of research, full side effect potential is not fully understood. You may find some information from direct user experience on internet message boards, but most of this will be opinion with little factual data to back it up.
If you are attempting to buy any of the pre-clinical SARMS you will find it’s not all that easy. Many research chemical companies sell SARMS but S4, LGD-4033 and MK 2866 will be what are commonly found. You will not find an abundant market of the pre-clinical versions until if and when GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), GTx and Ligand Pharmaceuticals complete further studies; the three representing the primary researchers and developers of SARMS and related medications with GTx being perhaps the most advanced. Buyers should beware if they come across pre-clinical SARM purchases online. While such purchases are possible, they are not common and will generally be fake.
