Dean Destructo
New member
[h=1]Cryolipolysis for Targeted Fat Reduction and Improved Appearance of the EnlargedMale Breast.[/h]Munavalli GS1, Panchaprateep R.
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h][h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h]<abstracttext label="BACKGROUND" nlmcategory="BACKGROUND">Pseudogynecomastia refers to benign male breast enlargement due to excess subareolar fat. Standard treatment is surgical excision under general anesthesia, liposuction, or a combination of both.</abstracttext>
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h]<abstracttext label="OBJECTIVE" nlmcategory="OBJECTIVE">The safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis was investigated for nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia.</abstracttext>
[h=4]METHODS AND MATERIALS:[/h]<abstracttext label="METHODS AND MATERIALS" nlmcategory="METHODS">Enrollment consisted of 21 males with pseudogynecomastia. Subjects received a firsttreatment consisting of a 60-minute cryolipolysis cycle, followed by a two-minute massage, and a second 60-minute cycle with 50% treatment area overlap. At 60 days of follow-up, subjects received a second 60-minute treatment. Safety was evaluated by monitoring side effects and adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by ultrasound, clinical photographs, and subject surveys.</abstracttext>
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h]<abstracttext label="RESULTS" nlmcategory="RESULTS">Surveys revealed that 95% of subjects reported improved visual appearance and 89% reported reduced embarrassment associated with pseudogynecomastia. Ultrasound showed mean fat layer reduction of 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Blinded reviewers correctly identified 82% of baseline photographs. Side effects included mild discomfort duringtreatment and transient paresthesia and tenderness. One case of paradoxical hyperplasia (PH) occurred but likelihood of PH in the male breast is not believed to be greater than in any other treatment area.</abstracttext>
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h]<abstracttext label="CONCLUSION" nlmcategory="CONCLUSIONS">This study demonstrated feasibility of cryolipolysis for safe, effective, and well-tolerated nonsurgicaltreatment of pseudogynecomastia.</abstracttext>
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h][h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h]<abstracttext label="BACKGROUND" nlmcategory="BACKGROUND">Pseudogynecomastia refers to benign male breast enlargement due to excess subareolar fat. Standard treatment is surgical excision under general anesthesia, liposuction, or a combination of both.</abstracttext>
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h]<abstracttext label="OBJECTIVE" nlmcategory="OBJECTIVE">The safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis was investigated for nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia.</abstracttext>
[h=4]METHODS AND MATERIALS:[/h]<abstracttext label="METHODS AND MATERIALS" nlmcategory="METHODS">Enrollment consisted of 21 males with pseudogynecomastia. Subjects received a firsttreatment consisting of a 60-minute cryolipolysis cycle, followed by a two-minute massage, and a second 60-minute cycle with 50% treatment area overlap. At 60 days of follow-up, subjects received a second 60-minute treatment. Safety was evaluated by monitoring side effects and adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by ultrasound, clinical photographs, and subject surveys.</abstracttext>
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h]<abstracttext label="RESULTS" nlmcategory="RESULTS">Surveys revealed that 95% of subjects reported improved visual appearance and 89% reported reduced embarrassment associated with pseudogynecomastia. Ultrasound showed mean fat layer reduction of 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Blinded reviewers correctly identified 82% of baseline photographs. Side effects included mild discomfort duringtreatment and transient paresthesia and tenderness. One case of paradoxical hyperplasia (PH) occurred but likelihood of PH in the male breast is not believed to be greater than in any other treatment area.</abstracttext>
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h]<abstracttext label="CONCLUSION" nlmcategory="CONCLUSIONS">This study demonstrated feasibility of cryolipolysis for safe, effective, and well-tolerated nonsurgicaltreatment of pseudogynecomastia.</abstracttext>
