I am reading many madical paper on the HGH,
i.e. see this: http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/37/2/100.short
everybody agree that no muscle mass gains are due to the HGH,
only fatt loss due to the increase of the fatty acids in the blood as the result of the lypolisis.
everybody agree that rHGH, is lypolitic but nobody refers about muscle growth.
What you think?
May be the insuline has been the responsible for the muscle growth in the new era of body building and
the rhgh is only responsibile of the extreme definitions.
i.e. see this: http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/37/2/100.short
everybody agree that no muscle mass gains are due to the HGH,
only fatt loss due to the increase of the fatty acids in the blood as the result of the lypolisis.
everybody agree that rHGH, is lypolitic but nobody refers about muscle growth.
What you think?
May be the insuline has been the responsible for the muscle growth in the new era of body building and
the rhgh is only responsibile of the extreme definitions.