Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

KRELEX

New member
Hey guys,

I'm doing this post because i wonder if Growth Hormone has different effects depending on the manufacturer and how it may be made (based on what technology , type of bacteria used and for what specific treatment (i.e: children growth deficit, adults GH deficit, people suffering from aids....). I mean, myself being an alltime user of 100% genuine pharma grade GH at 5iu a day and from time to time 10 ius 2-3 times a week, i noticed more a shredding effect from it more than anything else, muscles are fuller of course , pumps are great when dosed preworkout, sleep quality is top notch , but mass building - wise i notice nothing to be honest if not very minimal results. I usually use it 2 to 3 months on then one month off all year long.

If you wonder how i can afford it or from where do i get it, its pretty simple i take mine from a real and regular pharmacy and price wise lets just say its a win win situation for both of us. so concerning quality and purity and storage condition i can confirm its as good as it could be no doubt about it. I use the brand OMNITROPE , it comes in a box of five cartridges of 15iu each (5mgx1,ml) , so each box has roughly 75iu in it.

If I'm asking this question it's because i noticed that a lot of people in my entourage talk about this supposed difference in effects provided by different brands of gh. But I always was skeptical about it because for me its the same compound and it doesnt really matter how it was made isnt it?
Well thats what i firmly believed until i stumbled accros a video of an IFBB pro assessing the subject and saying that in fact there is such a difference between brands regarding the effects it provides, some working better for fat loss and recomp, some more for apetite improvement and muscle building, others for fullness of the muscle. He said he used a bunch of pharma grade GH and he noticed that from a brand to another the resulting effects on his body were not quite the same.

Unfortunately, i couldnt find much info about this, and globally i found people in other forums saying the same thing as me ... GH is GH especially when its pharma grade, results will be the same regardless of the brand used it is only how our body responds to it that matters and nothing else.

I would love to know what are your toughts about the subject and if you have ever already used more than one type of pharma grade GH , did you notice a difference in the effects it provided jumping from one brand to another.

For my part , i aim to gather as much insight possible about the following brands as they are the one i can have easy access to and durable supply : OMNITROPE , SAIZEN , GENOTONORM , NORDITROPINE.
 
Growth hormone is growth hormone in my opinion, meaning as long as its real pharmaceutical grade HGH then their should NOT be any difference at all.

I believe its the generics that vary in potency and overall outcome , but that shouldnt be the case with real HGH as far as im concerned.

I wouldnt mind you posting that video of said IFBB pro speaking on this.

Also, this goes for anything really. I know guys claim our IGF-1 lr3 is better than other companies and such, and the truth of the matter is ours isnt better than anyone other "REAL IGF-1 LR3" keyword obviously bieng "real"

I would love to know why or what would cause one pharma grade HGH to be better or deliver different types of results than another pharma grade HGH.

Great post topic by the way brutha!
 
I have always had access to pharma Serostim and Humatrope and BOTH are amazing quality growth. Just a few IU per day gets me exceptional results. Leaner, fuller more defined. Sleep, skin, hair, nails all improved.
 
Man! i hope you understand arabic or have someone in your entourage that does, because the video is in arabic and i cant find the english version of it anymore (he may probably have moved it to instagram). The dude's name is Mahmood Al Durrah, here is the link to the video YouTube . Based on what he's saying in the video , its linked to the way it is synthetised, which bacteria is used as a vector and what specific technology is used also, he also says no wonder why some forms come in one time injection vials like serostim and others require a pen and that doctors choose a specific type of GH brands to prescripe to children and another to other issues. I personnaly never heard of a chil being prescribed serostims for example. maybe due to the ease of use of pens over vials but i became convinced that it may not be the only reason after all.

AND yes see i am also an advocate of the fact that a compound is still a compound no matter how it is compounded. But it reminds me back of my third AAS cycle, the two before it i used two british pharma blue tabs Dbol, the third i got myself raw Dbol powder from an asian pharma lab, got it HPLC tested in a university lab and it came with a 95,46% purity which based on the lab analyst is not pharma standards but is pretty close anyways. Well would you believe me if i told you that the blue tabs dbol had a completely different effect on me thant the powder (i diluted it is grain proof alcohol 9O°) . 4 weeks on each with 3 weaks off in between, I was on 500mg test E , 350mg Nandrlone decanoate per week and 50mg dbol a day (split in five doses for both the tabs and liquid version).
I got more havoc in my stomach with the tabs , nearly no gyno or bloated effect (some water retention of course but nothing to worry of), decent strenght gains and felt good overall. with the liquid form , my stomach was behaving better (even with that alcohol in it, how ironic is it lol), but my gyno started to show up, i was a bit bloated and lethargic. I have my blood tested in a regular manner, once every two months and sometimes even twice a month, and beside my lipid profile being a little bit disturbed and my test levels out of the range, ther is nothing more to draw attention. So isnt there a difference in effects also in how the product is compounded (buffers used, dosing, way of adminstration etc etc etc)
 
The only Pharma brand I have used is also Omnitrope, prescribed to me by my hormone doc, but I only get about 0.5-1 iu per day. It's such a little amount that I can't tell if it's doing much though I do seem to be a little leaner from it. I've always got much more out of using IGF-1lr3 than HGH, and I think it's time to get some more as I'm really not so happy with the small amount of GH.
 
True , i will probably get myself some MC IGF , its by far the most potent IGF i tried. I can fairly say its quite close to the increlex effect in term of pump. But i prefer MC IGF for its long acting effect and also price wise cause increlex is quite a budget to run even for one month (600€ per Vial).
 
True , i will probably get myself some MC IGF , its by far the most potent IGF i tried. I can fairly say its quite close to the increlex effect in term of pump. But i prefer MC IGF for its long acting effect and also price wise cause increlex is quite a budget to run even for one month (600€ per Vial).


I havent used increlex, but ours is comes from a couple different manufactures as we can only get so much at a time from places like sigma aldrich
 
Back
Top