Posted by dancer on AF
Dancer
Unremitting Drugy posted 07-10-2002 12:44 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
first I really dont understand the var bridge (which is basically your first cycle) , I mean come on you might as well do halo... var still "the bridge" on most of the boards (although I understand you want to do a stand alone cycle with it). my $.10 dbol should be "the bridge" but people still see something in using var. even on cycle, I think Decaman pointed out, you might as well do winny at 100-200mg ED cost and results would be better.
half life
var--- 9-10 hours
halo-- 9-10 hours
mg for mg halo kicks the shit out var in every way. they are both both 17aa... according to medline var mg for mg is more liver toxic than anadrol ( go do a search on UG long discussion couple of studies)... I am just missing the boat here why would any one F**k the cash on var...
in conclusion dont f*&k you cash on var. either do morning dbol at low dosages or go all out.
when life gives you lemons, put your foot up life's ass
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dancer
Unremitting Drugy posted 07-11-2002 06:49 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's how suppresive var is to natural test
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/84/8/2705
'Total serum T concentrations were within normal physiological range on day 0 (449 ± 35 ng/dL) and day 3 (441 ± 44 ng/dL) of OX treatment. However, by day 5, total serum T concentrations were significantly reduced (282 ± 45 ng/dL; P < 0.05) below day 0 and day 3 values (Fig. 3). Serum free T concentrations were within normal physiological range on days 0, 3, and 5. However, by day 5, serum free T concentrations were significantly reduced (98 ± 10 pg/mL; P < 0.001) below day 0 (121 ± 12 pg/mL) and day 3 (126 ± 9 pg/mL) values. Hence, the total androgen concentration (T + OX) was reduced in parallel to the reduction in T (Fig. 3).'