HGH effective---- SubQ Or IM?

[modizzle]

Just wanted know from experience bros who have used hgh either SubQ or IM? or both and which one they found Effective...

 

[saudades]

I always thought you don't inject HGH IM, only subq like slin.

 

[mace]

My vote was for SubQ because I have never done IM. IMO the active life is too short and you wouldn't get the benefits of an IM injection.

 

[Willieman]

My vote was for SubQ because I have never done IM. IMO the active life is too short and you wouldn't get the benefits of an IM injection.

Excactly...

 

[TheJester]

My vote was for SubQ because I have never done IM. IMO the active life is too short and you wouldn't get the benefits of an IM injection.

I disagree. Most people shoot GH SubQ; people assume there must be a reason why, and myths are born. If you look at the clinical info provided by various GH manufacturers, you will see that the bioavailability of GH administered SubQ v. IM is very close, as are the average plasma concentrations following administration. SubQ is approximately 10% higher because GH does absorb a little faster taken SubQ as opposed to IM (half-life is ~3-4 hours SubQ v. ~4-5 hours IM). However, because the slightly faster absorption rate and slightly higher plasma levels of GH taken SubQ do not necessarily translate into higher IGF-1 levels, there is no significant pharmacological difference between the two methods.

 

[fun28hi]

i do sub-q cause it is easier

 

[modizzle]

Lets hear some more discussion on this, so far SubQ is winning,....

 

[brew]

Never used it but I do know guys who IM it.....but sub q is far more popular

 

[finephysique]

Has to be Sub-Q for me for the localised fat burning you get at the injection site, plus I inject enough chemicals IM so anything that can be done SubQ effectively is a winner in my book

 

[supermannpc]

sub-q

 

[38532nd]

I was told by my doctor it dosen't matter how it is done it all goes to the same place. You won't see a difference either way.

 

[MdTNT]

Durring the period i was getting gh from my doc he and i go into a pretty good debate about this topic, it can be done either way....there are proponents for IM and some for sub-q.....pros and cons to both...my personal preference is sub-q....years of trial and error have brought me to light and doing it in the morning at the start of each day about 45 minutes before my first meal always tends to be best....but i'm jsut an old fart...

 

[climber]

Sub q.....Besides if youre a cheap ass, you can re-use needles that don't go into the muscle (not that I reccommend it).
Climber

 

[MdTNT]

Sub q.....Besides if youre a cheap ass, you can re-use needles that don't go into the muscle (not that I reccommend it).
Climber

Ugh... bro, there is a sanity issue regardless in using a pin twice...first off as it pierces the transdermal layer of skin it starts to bend, you cant se this with the naked eye but the tip of the needle after one use is substgantialy blunted....soem where on here we have soem photos of pins after re-use and they are not pretty piuctures, magnified 100's of times so you can see it better. Second, the little tiny hole in that pin can collect and hold skin tissue, another major issue as that is where staph infections harbor and breed...when conditions are right you end up with a nsaty sore which can lead to surgery or worse.....be smart, pins...especially slin pins are a dime a dozen...literally...Md-

 

[big danny]

Agree, do not under any circumstances use the same need. twice. It is so easy to puchase them nowdays. If you have difficulties finding them go here:

http://www.sterilesyringes.com/

 

[saturn1]

From the many Research articles done on effectiveness of administartion of HGH there really isnt a Big enough difference in regards to effecting protien synthesis and other hormone produce by HGH Taken via IM or SUB-Q.

Id like to see some research on I.V. use simply because the guy im training now swears by it and by the way he's growing I cant deny his claim........Yet I certainly cant back it up due to the fact that ive totally chaged his training and nutrition protocol which could certainly account for his changes........But it's certainly interesting.

 

[saudades]

There was a guy on the board earlier (handle was tomsizemore) who also swore by the I.V. method, but he never could quite prove the gains he said he got from it since he wouldn't post pictures. I don't know if I could ever do it that way--too scary. Maybe if I had a doctor show me exactly how to do it. I've been doing IM for HGH, and it has been working really well.

 

[bigbaldbulldog]

I also heard and read that HGH doe sot work till your liver has processed it and broken it down into a useable form called IGF from there it is broken down again into MGF and from there is used by the body.

How and where you inject it is not important.. timing is key with hormones.. Know when to inject is more important where!!

 

[Presser]

very old poll but i thought i would bump it up and see if opinions have changed any over the last 10 years

 

[Mountain_Man]

My vote was for SubQ because I have never done IM. IMO the active life is too short and you wouldn't get the benefits of an IM injection.

Agreed 100% brother