Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

IGF-1 lr3 aka Long R3 IGF-1 FAQ cycle doses use. Best Peptide IGF-1 lr3

Yes they come reconstituted and not with bacteriostatic water with acetic acid which will make it last longer then regular bacteriostatic water. correct me if I'm wrong anyone, but I would suggest at least six months. Longer than you should need it to last unless you're ordering more than 4 bottles..

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Holy crap are you kidding me? The $195 vial is unconstituted and after reconstitution they recommend no longer then a WEEK.
 
Yeah bro you dont wanna use bact or sterile water with ur igf-1 lr3, bigmills is correct, its best in acetic acid solution and last many months this way, and glacial acid is what the actual patent owner of IGF-1 lr3 reccomends, reason is glacial acid doesnt have the water molecule, but for our needs, acetic acid is sufficient!
 
Yeah bro you dont wanna use bact or sterile water with ur igf-1 lr3, bigmills is correct, its best in acetic acid solution and last many months this way, and glacial acid is what the actual patent owner of IGF-1 lr3 reccomends, reason is glacial acid doesnt have the water molecule, but for our needs, acetic acid is sufficient!
So should all peptides be reconstituted with acetic acid?

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
first time igf user, just pinned 50 mcgs left quads 40 min ago, now eating some oatmeal and whey and gonna hit the gym for legs.

hope the pump will be extreme, let u guys now
 
I have been considering trying this for some time now as i have been using HGH (3 IUs/day) since mid-April. So, you only take it for 50 days and then break for a while? Is this an IM shot or SubQ (like i do my HGH)? I am assuming since it is micrograms it would have to be a SubQ shot using a slin pin. Excuse my ignorance. I have a friend using it and having good results. He's also using Ipamorelin which I know nothing about.
 
Most people i know including myself take it long term, the 40 to 50 days on then off is very old information, when it first came out like 14 years ago or so, you can stay on it for many months and still see the progress happening months into using it!You can use it either subq or Muscle! I have used it both ways, and its my opinion that both ways work just as well, however for added muscle, i would go IM however for long term use and more overall fatburning i would run it subq
 
I have been considering trying this for some time now as i have been using HGH (3 IUs/day) since mid-April. So, you only take it for 50 days and then break for a while? Is this an IM shot or SubQ (like i do my HGH)? I am assuming since it is micrograms it would have to be a SubQ shot using a slin pin. Excuse my ignorance. I have a friend using it and having good results. He's also using Ipamorelin which I know nothing about.

I borrowed the below from another forum. From what I have learned you only really need IGF and drop the other peptides. I am getting ready to do that and overall it will make it more affordable.

GHRP-6 is sloppier in that it activates a wider array of effects beyond GH release. It causes intense hunger and gastic motility. It can have a mild effect on cortisol and prolactin. It is a first generation GHRP.


GHRP-2 is less sloppy with a more intense GH release, no gastric motility and less hunger effect. It can have an effect within the normal range on prolcatin and cortisol. It is a second generation peptide.


Ipamorelin is not sloppy at all. It does not release as much GH as GHRP-2 but it causes virtually no hunger or gastric motility and for the most part does not effect cortisol or prolactin. It is a third generation peptide


You would choose GHRP-2 unless you wanted GHRP-6 for the hunger effect or for the lower release profiles.


You would choose GHRP-2 normally as the most bang for the buck.


If you are very sensitive to perturbations in cortisol or prolactin you would choose the more expensive Ipamorelin.
 
So should all peptides be reconstituted with acetic acid?

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

fuck i answered this yesterday lol, or two days ago lol, i guess it didnt go through due to all the site bullshit going on with our server

So the real short answer is NO! All peptides do not need to be in acetic acid. And the reason you use acetic acid solution, or Glacial acid is mainly due to keeping it viable for longer periods of time, 1mg of igf-1 lr3 is 1,000mcgs, and your not going to use all that up in a day or two, so you need to use something that will keep your peptide from degrading.

Now if you were say a pro bodybuilder, and used up 1mg of IGF-1 lr3 in a day or two, by taking say 500mcgs daily, then you can use bacteriostatic or sterile water to reconstitute it, although, even day two your IGF-1 lr3 will start to degrade, but you get my point, and most of us Humans who dont use an entire 1mg vial of igf-1 lr3 in a day or two, lol, well we need it stored in aa solution so that its viable for long periods of time!

So NO is the answer to your questions,
 
fuck i answered this yesterday lol, or two days ago lol, i guess it didnt go through due to all the site bullshit going on with our server

So the real short answer is NO! All peptides do not need to be in acetic acid. And the reason you use acetic acid solution, or Glacial acid is mainly due to keeping it viable for longer periods of time, 1mg of igf-1 lr3 is 1,000mcgs, and your not going to use all that up in a day or two, so you need to use something that will keep your peptide from degrading.

Now if you were say a pro bodybuilder, and used up 1mg of IGF-1 lr3 in a day or two, by taking say 500mcgs daily, then you can use bacteriostatic or sterile water to reconstitute it, although, even day two your IGF-1 lr3 will start to degrade, but you get my point, and most of us Humans who dont use an entire 1mg vial of igf-1 lr3 in a day or two, lol, well we need it stored in aa solution so that its viable for long periods of time!

So NO is the answer to your questions,
Thanks! Refrigerate or room temp for storage? I put unconstituted vials in the freezer and reconstituted in the fridge curren.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
fridge is where i keep mine, though in aa solution its viable even at room temperature for some time, and we have an actual study posted in this forum about that
 
well, i guess i might give this a whirl once I am done with this Primo cycle. I like to keep new chemicals in my body separate from the old ones so I can see if they are really doing something. I'll continue to use my GH tho--i just ordered a new batch.
 
well, i guess i might give this a whirl once I am done with this Primo cycle. I like to keep new chemicals in my body separate from the old ones so I can see if they are really doing something. I'll continue to use my GH tho--i just ordered a new batch.
Great idea. You won't be disappointed.
 
But ig u sd in between 40 snd 6ch of igf snd not any igf but mc'd u could drop your gh ff down just below 2 iu's and get almost twice the results got thr gh sbd ur ASS and be fwlllllllll

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Has anyone done bloodwork after a few weeks?

A few guys posted their blood work while on our igf and while I would love to take credit for their elevated igf levels , truth is it's not that simple, and hard to test accurately as it lists free floating igf levels which might seem great to most but that means unbound which isn't good and there's a lot more to it then I can explain but we do have a great thread on this exact topic explaining better than I can. I'll see if I can't find the thread and bump it up later from my PC as I'm on phone trying to type this message lol
 
A few guys posted their blood work while on our igf and while I would love to take credit for their elevated igf levels , truth is it's not that simple, and hard to test accurately as it lists free floating igf levels which might seem great to most but that means unbound which isn't good and there's a lot more to it then I can explain but we do have a great thread on this exact topic explaining better than I can. I'll see if I can't find the thread and bump it up later from my PC as I'm on phone trying to type this message lol
Cool, thanks man.
 
Ok well Below is the reasoning and this was found on another site as I can't find our thread on it which I think is even more elaborate than the info below but it's basically the same information, and again we've had a few guys come on here and rave how happy they were that their igf levels on blood test were so high and like I said earlier , I'd love to say "of course it's from our igf " but the blood test isn't an indicator of anything when it comes to whether ur igf-1 lr3 is real or dosed right. Anyhow below is the reasoning and again you can find a great post on it in this forum if you search hard enough ,


you cannot gauge exogenous igf1 levels due to the fact that the blood work only shows bound igf1. The idea behind LR3 is keeping it unbound so it goes systematic. So the test you had was not an indicator if your actual IGF-1 LR3 levels in the blood.


IGF-1 blood tests look only for bound IGF-1 while the purpose of IGF-1 LR3 is to keep it unbound and therefore bioavailable meaning it will not show up on conventional blood tests. It is the same scenario as for blood tests which examine testosterone levels. Many people can have results showing low or normal testosterone levels, but have high ***8220;free testosterone***8221; levels ***8211; which is much more important, since only testosterone which is not bound to SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin) can be used by the body.
Therefore your levels of IGF-1 on a blood test are not of much importance and do not take into account the increase from IGF-1 LR3 usage, as they only look at bound IGF-1 (which cannot be used by the body since it***8217;s attached to binding proteins).


 
Ok well Below is the reasoning and this was found on another site as I can't find our thread on it which I think is even more elaborate than the info below but it's basically the same information, and again we've had a few guys come on here and rave how happy they were that their igf levels on blood test were so high and like I said earlier , I'd love to say "of course it's from our igf " but the blood test isn't an indicator of anything when it comes to whether ur igf-1 lr3 is real or dosed right. Anyhow below is the reasoning and again you can find a great post on it in this forum if you search hard enough ,


you cannot gauge exogenous igf1 levels due to the fact that the blood work only shows bound igf1. The idea behind LR3 is keeping it unbound so it goes systematic. So the test you had was not an indicator if your actual IGF-1 LR3 levels in the blood.


IGF-1 blood tests look only for bound IGF-1 while the purpose of IGF-1 LR3 is to keep it unbound and therefore bioavailable meaning it will not show up on conventional blood tests. It is the same scenario as for blood tests which examine testosterone levels. Many people can have results showing low or normal testosterone levels, but have high ***8220;free testosterone***8221; levels ***8211; which is much more important, since only testosterone which is not bound to SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin) can be used by the body.
Therefore your levels of IGF-1 on a blood test are not of much importance and do not take into account the increase from IGF-1 LR3 usage, as they only look at bound IGF-1 (which cannot be used by the body since it***8217;s attached to binding proteins).


What about GH serum? Wouldn't that increase if you have supplemental IGF-1?
 
Back
Top