I'll add some comments...
machine99 said:
Ok so by using a same amount of deca in all your cycles you are hoping that this will help your lipid profile. Ok well I could throw that into my cycles, might help.
Again, I need to explain this further. I have never had a cholesterol problem. Clearly, there are genetic factors involved because there are quite a few people who live a fairly healthy lifestyle yet have terrible profiles. I am not one of them. My poor profile was a direct result of exo AAS use, specifically dbol and testosterone @ 500mg/wk.
It's not my intention to use deca to
fix my poor lipid profile because it's not a cholesterol specific drug (e.g., a statin). You can't use one AAS to fix another's sides in this case. I expect my cholesterol profile to return to baseline simply by dropping my testosterone levels back into physiological range (based on the comments made by SWALE - a HRT doc who frequents the Internet boards) and not using dbol or any 17-AA drug for that matter . So don't expect Deca to fix your lipid profile while you're slamming a bunch of other stuff.
I found a company that will provide bloodwork requisitions to a local lab for my bloodwork, and their prices are extremely reasonable. I think the cholesterol profile was like $30. So I'll monitor this panel periodically and will be able to tell how I'm doing.
As far as causing irreverisble damage, by using what dose? 750-1000mg/week? Do you have any studies that show the permenant side effects from these doses over 600mg/week of test which had relatively low amount of sides.
I think you're talking apples, while I'm talking oranges. I'm not as concerned about the immediate sides from AAS. We all know that they're temporary. I'm concerned about the anomalies that the side effects leave behind long after they've disappeared. This is a problem because, as far as I know, there have been no long term studies performed on AAS users. Like I said earlier, just because things look good on the surface doesn't mean that something bad is happening on a microscopic level. And I know that there are no guarantees in life, blah, blah...But I
can control what I put in my own body, and knowing what I've read, seeing the results of some of my own tests, this is the direction that I've chosen for myself.
Also with primo and anavar these are steroids that are always considered "safer" when considering your blood pressure, cholestrol. But of course everything has side effects.
Again, just because there may not be any readily apparent sides caused from these drugs does not mean that they are not adversely affecting your physiology in some manner. Look at Parabolan...That drug was pulled after many years of use for a reason and it seems to have been due to renal problems. Well just what do you feel when your kidneys are failing. The fact is you don't feel anything until it's too late. I have an older friend (bodybuilder and former AAS user) who suffered complete renal failure and he told me he went years without any symptoms whatsoever until, one day, his kidneys just stopped working altogether.
What would be supraphysiological dose of GH?
GH is tricky because everyone metabolizes this drug so differently. Also, the half life is so short. That's why you test your somatomedin-C serum level to determine if you're GHD. So any dose of exo GH that pushes your IGF-1 level out of physiological range would have to be considered supraphysiological.
what would be high and what would be too high according to the studys that this info is based on.
not a study, bro...just information from HRT docs like SWALE that they have witnessed firsthand from their patients. You would have to have your hormone panels checked after reaching a steady state at a given dose to determine if that dose is correct for you.
Thanks for the compliment.