Nikon
New member
Although that is definitely a true statement, Trestolone is giving Testosterone a run for its money.There's always a need to run test. It's the one hormone responsible for your man hood. Don't run it and see how you feel.
I absolutely agree that Testosterone should be ran with EVERY compound (as a base at the very least), but Trestolone can absolutely take its place in a cycle or even when ran solo.
I can definitely tell a difference between Test and Trest. Trest causes increased core temp, better pumps in the gym, and causes my sex drive to go through the roof! Other than that, they are the same.
I read a study a while back that explained how Testosterone and Trestolone are so similar in the way they function, that they compete for the same receptors. I did a lot of research on this, because I wanted to know for sure if I needed to run Test as a base with Trest.
The problem (or benefit, depending on how you look at) is that Trestolone is so much stronger, that it renders the Testosterone practically useless.
Trestolone can be used as a complete replacement for Testosterone (I have done this several times, and have felt great while on cycle).
In fact, Pfizer has picked it up for this very reason. It is being researched for HRT, and also as a Male Contraceptive because it shuts you down so hard. I dread the day it's released, because I know the prices are gonna go through the roof!
I am not running Trestolone this cycle, because I think it is a good idea to rotate the two.
Test one cycle, then Trest the next cycle.
I believe that this will keep my receptors fresh and more responsive to the two compounds.
Anyway, please don't be offended Jo-Seef, my intentions are not to argue or insult you.
I hope that we are all here to teach and learn from each other.
I will do my best to find the study I referred to when I get time, but I vaguely recall it requiring some significant digging.
Thanks for the advice, and thanks for following!
Last edited: